FANDOM


(Created page with "<div class="quote">Ahmad15 wrote: Okay, first off, this is NOT arguing. </div> Even if it was, there's nothing wrong with that. <div class="quote">Ahmad15 wrote: I will hee...")
 
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
</div>
 
</div>
   
Even if it was, there's nothing wrong with that.
+
Even if it were, there's nothing wrong with that.
   
 
<div class="quote">Ahmad15 wrote:
 
<div class="quote">Ahmad15 wrote:

Latest revision as of 12:52, September 1, 2014

Ahmad15 wrote:

Okay, first off, this is NOT arguing.

Even if it were, there's nothing wrong with that.

Ahmad15 wrote:

I will heed your warning whatsoever, so don't worry. I'm just gonna "follow then reject" the order.

I hope that doesn't mean you're going to intentionally derail threads again. That is, unless you want to be blocked for a period of time.

Ahmad15 wrote:

I thought I was just testing if you're a computerized robot or something. You can't stay without emotions forever. We're all living people here. I tried and I succeeded. You are a living being, too.

Professionalism. Google it.

Ahmad15 wrote:

Next up, I am familiar with the rules here. Normally, unless the crime is an illegal thing, like illegal video links, then you can't have minimal warnings.

I can, and I have. Regardless, you derailed an announcement. Announcements contain information for all users on the wiki, and they need to be able to ask questions about them, should there be a need for it. In addition, you were basically trolling. I don't think I need to tell you why that's not acceptable.

Ahmad15 wrote:

In case you're speaking by the prespective of me having been blocked before, then it is not supposed to count, as the reason for that is practically different than derailing. Once more, that does not mean one must minimize warnings.

I didn't check your block log, actually. There was no need. I would have blocked you immediately (maybe for a day or three), but I let Cokedragon take the lead on this issue, so as not to be accused of bias. He decided not to block you (or TJlive800), so I didn't block you either.

Ahmad15 wrote:

Unless you find something good to point out after this, I'm not gonna reply anymore to this thread.

Your replies are not necessary, unless you have questions. If you have questions, you should always ask them.

Ahmad15 wrote:

Also, this message is not derailing or vandalism, so you have no reason to block me for this message. You would have to start with a warning.

And this is relevant... why?

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.