The Hunt For The Omnitrix is not only suppose too be about vilgac, it's suppose too detail the events that dont involve him as well, it's basically a summary of all those episodes and it's suppose too be that way. Im sorry too have too say that if cannot edit properly do not edit at all, because next time I'll have to report it.
I deleted the entire article. After a quick reading, I noticed it's mostly fan cruft, not to mention poorly written. If anyone wants it back, be prepared to rewrite it in full, because it won't be restored otherwise.
Things and situations that happen on other sites have nothing to do with the wiki, please do not report it here. Im sorry if you were insulted, but the wiki has nothing to do with ask.fm out side of sources from derrick j wyatt, and thats only because he uses that site too answer questions. Other than that we have no connection too ask.fm what so ever.
Spammers are people who make nonsense posts or spam a lot of words, example: "i like pie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", they also spam in all caps that make them look like they are ragin "WHY YOU BLOCKED ME?????/".
Chat moderators are people who can kick and ban someone from Wikia chat.
Let's get started then, you don't use periods or capital letters, you link text (that you couldn't mark correctly) to wrong articles, you underline text when you can see that it's not presented on any other articles, you can't place pictures to articles, you can't add references (which is also represented in almost all pages so you literally only needed to copy it), for some reason you added grey background to text and the list just goes on, literally, you haven't made a single edit/comment yet that didn't have any of these problems.
I mostly do that, every day in fact, but the article you created is speculative which is against the rules but you should know that already. And maybe, I'm just sick of correcting people's (who were told not to edit) mistakes.
.......did you even read what I said, I know he said those things but not everything he says goes on pages or counts too create a page. Like for example this one http://ask.fm/DerrickJWyatt/answer/121023411060 that is obviously a joke, and this he didn't exactly flat out say yes http://ask.fm/DerrickJWyatt/answer/121021773684 granted what he said sorta like a yes but still not there. Also that ujin page you does not follow how we make pages here and that picture you uploaded was bad quality for it. So in short not everything he says goes on the pages or deserves too made into a page.
I Do not approve of your ujin article but another user is dealing with that mess, second i was about too talk about your benzarro edit. After looking it over i can see i was wrong about THAT edit, but i took the liberty of making more proffesinal. And again the themp khufan thing is basically a low level maybe. And the difference between his joking and his seriousness and his halk hearted replies is this they are obvious.
Well now the page slynoids has been updated with more information that did indeed come from Derrick, since he gave info about it has been updated alot more. But that still doesn't mean everything he says has too be on pages for example when he said that slynoids " were built somewhere" that's not acceptable as it is obviously still a joke and gives no info on where they're actually built. Also the ujin page, I strongly suggest you learn how to make a page properly because that ujin page was honestly a mess and especially since you just put a bad quality image of a random galvan. Also I'll have too ask that you do not try too recreate it because the character has not even shown up in the show.
He may not have appeared but the show crew confirms he is a character. We could put Image not available sign. Alot of times It has happened that a character has not appeared physically but has been mentioned and still has a page. Then an image not available sign is put. Same could happen with Ujin's page.
And okay, The sylonnoid and benzarro affair is closed but the thep khufans and ujin's affair still remains.
I highlighted the thread, but, apparently, that wasn't enough. Since this is a new rule, I won't block you right away like I said in my last warning; however, if you break another rule, you will be blocked (assuming the rule wasn't added after this post).
One, because I (and others who post in threads) are only supposed to check the timestamp of the post immediately before our own for this rule. That's why only the first user who posts in a thread that's over one month old gets warned - you can check this yourself - since the thread was no longer over one month old after a user broke a rule and posted in it. In other words, I broke no rule. Two, if I were to block myself for the very first offense in this rule, I'd also need to block you and every other user who did this the first time, as well as those who posted afterward because they were misled by those who broke the rule. Seeing as how you've already received an ultimatum, that would mean you'd be blocked forever.