FANDOM


 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Oppose|Opppose, leaning towards neutral}} - Considering that BTP has a history of creating new usergroups, it should be noted that there also has been redundancy at times. Seeing that there are a lot of admins already for this sizable wiki, there shouldn't be much need for an additional admin like group, for the forums. Also, I haven't seen much malicious activity in the forums for a new, whole group to monitor it. So, I don't think there really is a necessity for a new group where there aren't many suitable candidates for the user right.
+
{{Oppose|Opppose, leaning towards neutral}} Considering that BTP has a history of creating new usergroups, it should be noted that there also has been redundancy at times. Seeing that there are a lot of admins already for this sizable wiki, there shouldn't be much need for an additional admin like group, for the forums. Also, I haven't seen much malicious activity in the forums for a new, whole group to monitor it. So, I don't think there really is a necessity for a new group where there aren't many suitable candidates for the user right.

Latest revision as of 06:15, August 9, 2013

Oppose Oppose — Opppose, leaning towards neutral Considering that BTP has a history of creating new usergroups, it should be noted that there also has been redundancy at times. Seeing that there are a lot of admins already for this sizable wiki, there shouldn't be much need for an additional admin like group, for the forums. Also, I haven't seen much malicious activity in the forums for a new, whole group to monitor it. So, I don't think there really is a necessity for a new group where there aren't many suitable candidates for the user right.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.