Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-34326521-20140915210718/@comment-25396661-20140921221940

Blaziken rjcf wrote: Mr.Mandude wrote: Blaziken rjcf wrote: Mr.Mandude wrote: What makes you say that? I read it. Well, there's the fact that you seem to believe information will be lost, even though it won't be. Read it again. That was a typo. I was saying it will be removed and placed into a LIST. I asumed people would be able to tell what I was saying from the context of the rest of the sentence. Then what's your objection? Information won't be lost; it will be moved. Is a different location somehow worse? Is the task of waiting less than half a second while Wikia redirects you from the leftover article to the proper section on the list too cumbersome?

I already said my objections. Check up towards the top of the page. I was justing saying that as a counter arguement to what Icame2play said. But honestly I do think that a different location is worse in this situation. I don't see any reason to do this. I agree with what the first few users on this page were saying. A list of characters like you are suggesting is usually for wikis that dont already have pages made for those characters.