Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-34326521-20140615235150/@comment-34326521-20140630000250

Cokedragon wrote: Blaziken rjcf wrote: Since nobody is suggesting proper numbers, here's my suggestion:

3 bureaucrats

2 admins

2 CVU

5 rollbacks

2 chat operators

This would account for approximately 23% of all active users, which would mean that about 77% would be regular users; a clear majority. I'll leave this here until tomorrow, at which point I will see where you stand and either approve or not these numbers. We don't really need chat operators, but if need be, 2 is alright.

Otherwise, this seems to be out of balance as it limits the admin and bureaucrat count to only 5. Seems rather unfortunate to just leave it to who's here for as long as we're all here. An odd number seems fitting regardless, but I feel admins should outnumber bureaucrats so...4 admins instead? Why should admins outnumber bureaucrats?