Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-24385550-20140329204934/@comment-5060080-20140406152723

Oneofthosedf wrote: Richard10 wrote: But that doesn't make sense. If it's flat out obvious something is something, why not edit it in? Why wait for them to point out the obvious if you can just look at the obvious? It's not about obvious. They just simply don't trust in Derrick. They don't care about that how many things he leaked or confirmed because sometimes he is joking and there are people who can't recognize a joke. I mean, really it's not hard to tell when he lies. It's not that, it's the fact that there have been different things confirmed. One source saying he isn't, and one source saying he is. It's not about how many times its been confirmed by Derrick, it's the fact that Matt (I think he's the other source) is the more reliable source. It does NOT, and I repeat NOT matter how many times Derrick says it. It only makes sense to do this, even if it is Darkstar, there isn't any 'obvious' proof (i am not counting anybody 'confirming it' becuase you know how that is) except the fact that he looks like Darkstar, which does not make him Darkstar. It's very likely Darkstar, but not 100% confirmed. It's like changing Spanner's Identity to Jimmy or whoever you think it is. This wiki is for canon things, and if there is even a small percentage of being incorrect, it does not belong here, because there is a chance to be wrong, which has happened on several occasions.