Thread:Superbike10/@comment-34326521-20140415071555/@comment-7763430-20140415182035

Superbike, Blaziken has adamantly discredited a valid source. My motion for his demotion is valid based on the grounds that he has violated Policy #6, placing his opinion above that of others (the majority, even). He placed poor information on a page and then locked it. He made a highlighted post that everyone would see claiming that Derrick J. Wyatt is an invalid source and that Kevin Rubio denied a statement from him. Neither of these things are correct.

Furthermore, Blaziken locked a second page directly related to the first for the same reasons, but left some "unreliable" Derrick J. Wyatt information in the trivia of that page, thus creating a double standard on the same argument.

Episode: Charmed, I'm Sure

Issue: Darkstar has been confirmed to be the stone figurine that resembles him by Derrick J. Wyatt. This has not been discredited by another source, but Blaziken has classified a vague/broad comment, an irrelevant one at that, from Kevin Rubio as a specific denial.

Motion: I move that the pages be changed to say in their trivia that "Derrick J. Wyatt has stated that the stone figure wearing the mask is the current embodiment of Darkstar."

-or-

All instances of information that has been solely confirmed by writers/producers/etc... be removed from the Wiki.

The problem isn't the content in question. It is the actions taken and the statements made. Stating that a reliable source has made a claim is not the same as saying that the claim is correct. If the reliable source is inaccurate at a later point in time, the information can be modified or changed, but no administrator should ever announce so publicly (a thread highlighted for everyone to be notified about it) that a reliable source is not so.