Thread:Natebigjoehoe/@comment-34326521-20160407094040/@comment-34326521-20160408075721

Again, I can't seem to find a direct link (Google lists a thread about those leaks that was deleted, presumably because they were real), but the website it came from is trustworthy, as far as leaks go.

Point is, this was discussed extensively when it first appeared. It's not something we added to the page on a whim. You're not the first one to complain, and I'm sure you won't be the last, and every time it's the same thing. The sources are buried under months of edits, the user claims the sources are non-existent and that because they don't believe it, the information should either be removed or made to appear uncertain.