Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-31420441-20170827150344/@comment-31420441-20170830134453

Blaziken rjcf wrote:
 * Now we're doing just fine with 2 bureaucrats and 1 admin, but I suppose we could add one for each, just in case.


 * I do have every right to do that, because it's not your decision. The CotG exists because the adminship says it does, just like suggestions work the way they do because the adminship says they do.


 * I disagree. There's minimal vandalism to take care of.


 * I was talking of the Custodians, CVUs and rollbacks as well, you know. Maybe you wanted to say their quota is 0. Well, okay. Just give me the numbers: Example.
 * Bureaucrats : 3
 * Admins : 2
 * and so on...


 * I am not saying its my decision but I don't find this logically/ethically/whatever correct to say that there are 0 Custodians but we will still have one seat for custodians in CotG. Though I admit, "right" was a wrong word, I should have said "moral right".


 * Well, if that's how you count activity, let me tell you there were more than 1 cases of vandalism today itself. Either way, this topic came up on your claiming you won't promote or demote people because of less activity. Well, at least you can demote useless rollbacks and custodians even if you don't need any. Especially if you don't need any.

There are users like Ultiverse, Aaronbill3, Passport etc. who are better than those inactive people.