Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5584417-20140315150724/@comment-1409915-20140328165922

@Ultimates (mostly):

I find it unfair you would believe I would just post on a topic without reading what it was about first.

But away from that, my point either way is I still believe, coming from both an editor and fan, that saying “According to” would go a long way into insight as it still would inform anyone passing by on the wiki who said what. Now this might just be my nitpicky-ness when it comes to information but I believe for someone to come on the wiki and see that Rook says the core spins counter clockwise would go a longer way than just stating the core of Revonnah spins counter clockwise.

In the case of it being changed to just a fact then at that point to stay continuous to your decision you’d have to edit out things like “As seen in Bengeance is Mine, he can slow down time so he can seem to move very fast” to not include “as seen in, said episode”. Explained simpler, to adhere to the precedent you would have set you wouldn’t be able to state what episode powers appeared in. This however is different from things such as “Revealed in this episode”,like Charmcaster’s name being Hope or Ben being afraid of peacocks.

Also let the record stand I didn’t say “only when it is unnessecary” I said “at time's it may seem unecessary”.

