Thread:Shocker03/@comment-29558690-20170603072214/@comment-31420441-20170606145708

Dear readers of this message, please read till the end before reacting.

Well, I personally feel at least a one-line introduction of an article makes it much better. The first thing a person reads is what the article is about. Then the different versions of it. For example:

XYZ alien is the Omnitrix's DNA sample of ABC species from PQR planet.

See, why I say this is because
 * 1) It is a nice way to express an article. A reader who doesn't know what an article is about first gets to know that. Then he can see the versions, rather than jumping into the versions first. If he/she doesn't know what Heatblast is, its better to read that and then get into his original and reboot version.
 * 2) Also, more importantly, it will bring the OMNITRIX ALIEN pages IN LINE with OTHER pages that are merged, for example, Eon, Omnitrix and Ultimatrix (and there are more upcoming).
 * 3) These pages DEFINITELY need an introduction. Eon page explains why the information is bifurcated. Omnitrix page and Ultimatrix page explain in a one-line history of the different Omnitrixes and Ultimatrixes seen across the franchise.
 * 4) The Omnitrix Alien pages don't need any clarification of reason of bifurcation. So you all feel that we can make the tabs straight away. But in other cases, an explanation has to be given before the tabs.
 * 5) So it would be good to have everything in order, in UNIFORMITY. The same rules will apply on all types of pages.
 * 6) Less importantly, it saves the reader's time to NOT read the same thing twice. For example: The reader will read:
 * 7) *Reboot: Heatblast is the Omnitrix's DNA sample of a Pyronite from Pyros
 * 8) *Original: Heatblast is the Omnitrix's DNA sample of a Pyronite from Pyros
 * 9) *RAT Timeline: Heatblast from RAT Timeline is an alternate timeline version of Heatblast.
 * 10) **Problems with this are:
 * 11) **#Reader reads ditto-copy of information in Original and Reboot headings. These headings are meant to show differences between the versions, not replicate information. Isn't that why we are merging articles in the first place? (Right, Mizukage?)
 * 12) **#For the RAT Timeline, am I explaining what Heatblast is? No. So if the reader doesn't Heatblast in an Omnitrix alien, how will he come to know whether Heatblast is a character, villain, species, Omnitrix alien etc, if we first don't say he is an Omnitix DNA sample??

^ That is my opinion and what I believe is better. But the Wiki must follow the decision of the majority of users. After reading ALL the above carefully and open-mindedly, if some of you are still not convinced, we can start a suggestion on the forum and put it to vote. But I would highly recommend that you first read the above carefully and then weigh your thoughts on the matter. Thank You.