Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5584417-20140315150724/@comment-5584417-20140618112107

Ben10fan3 wrote: Proposal 2 is basically doing something that is also unnessecary. It also doesn't make sense because we already have according to and as mentioned by is very weak while acording to is strong. I don't get it why weak and strong really matters. I feel it is not logical. According to may be strong but it sounds a little like an opinion than a basic fact.

@6f5e4d and Ben10fan3

And we aren't removing 'According to' completely. It's there where it sounds right (Criteria 2 and 3)