Thread:Superbike10/@comment-35512623-20180506212750/@comment-29947090-20180528060515

I'm not trying to denounce him, but some of this information is weird.

1. I understand that Celestialsapiens need to bond their power to survive Anur Vladias and Omniversal destruction. I also understand that they could tehnically become omniscient  if they agreed on it; however, they would never actually do it. But here's what confuses me: a Celestialsapien can't survive timeline destruction? The Annihilaarg only creates a universe in a timeless environment where no universe exists. But if time & a universe exists, it will destroy it. So MoA is saying Alien X can survive the destruction of a universe with time in it, but can't survive the destruction of a timeline? Kind of contradictory.

2. When they say Alien X isn't omnipotent, do they mean you can only be called omnipotent if you're 100% Celestialsapien or do they mean he isn't omnipotent as in he can't accomplish everything like other Celestialsapiens?

3. A kid's toy means the Naljians aren't that great???

4. Ok

5. "Decisive Celestialsapiens can indeed hurt non-decisive Celestialspaiens if they are more powerful than their opponent on the level in which they are attacking. If not, they can be hurt in return."

Does this mean not all Celestialsapiens are equal to eachother in terms of power since they added the "if they are more powerful than their opponent" part. But here's what confuses me if this is true: Galactic Gladiator is a Celestialsapien, who is a gladiator and 100% Celestialsapien meaning he should be 100% omnipotent. If Alien X isn't omnipotent, meaning he's less powerful than Galactic Gladiator then that means Alien X IS omnipotent or it means Galactic Gladiator isn't omnipotent.

Not trying to say he's wrong, but it's all very confusing considering what's already been accepted as canon.