Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-2209832-20141104031143/@comment-5562625-20141118162836

Sigh. You are missed my point completely.

THERE IS NO SECURITY SYSTEM TO FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE. How could you put a "security system" on Newton's mechanic, for example? Or on the DNA theory?

The problem with nuclear bombs, is that they requied a enormous ammount of raw materials, energy and high-tech equipment to construct. And it's really hard to obtain all this. There is no "security system" - nuclar weapon have USA, Russia, UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel. South Africa have in previously, but decided to get rid of it. And many other countries attempted to build a nuclear weapon in the past - Sweden, Switzerland, Argentina, Brazil, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Lybia, Japan.

So the problem "why we didn't see other Omnitrix's around" hardly has anything to do with security systems. Most probably:

1) The Omnitrix is simply too hard to produce for individuals and even many goverment.

2) Without real mass-production (see 1) the military applications of Omnitrix are insignificant

3) Without clear military applications, most goverments that have resources to recreate the Omnitrix wouldn't bother to do it.