Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5486221-20190212142357/@comment-27464497-20190216134814

Literally just watch the episode, dude. In it Paradox says Ben's future changed meaning time had shifted. Now you're just being willfully ignorant about this. Since you're so opposed to watching the episode yourself I'll just quote it for you.

Kevin: I heard about you. You're the jerk from the future.

Ben 10,000: I'm a different Ben 10,000. But I do remember going to that future back when we were 10. What a buzz kill that guy was.

Young Ben: You're my real future?

Professor Paradox: Yes, if nothing occurs to change it. That's why I've bent the rules of time and brought you together.

This is on-screen evidence that not entire timelines are altered all the time, just parts of a timeline can be changed by this shifting time phenomenon. In this case, something happened to space-time which altered Ben Prime's future. The only difference between this and the OS/OV timeline is that Future OV Ben was confirmed to be the same Ben from the OS, while Future UA Ben is a different Ben from an entirely different timeline. Don't believe me? Actually watch the episode.

Since you're so pressed about evidence, here's an ask from DJW saying the original Ben 10,000 was brought back because Ultimate Ben 10,000 was a lame idea according to him. https://archive.is/RhKxO

We have information proving the two timelines are one through shifting time and statements. Even if Paradox himself didn't hop on-screen during Omniverse and say "Hey Ben, this is the first future you you met when you were 10" we can still logically deduce it is him through on-screen evidence and statements. You know, the stuff you've been ignoring this entire time?

The futures are confirmed to be the same but with alterations made to them. That was the entire point of the analogy. If I remodel your house by knocking down random walls and making new rooms, is your house now 'a completely different house? Or is it the same house but with some alterations made to it?' What part of this do you not understand? You can alter something without that alteration making it a ''completely different thing. ''Just because there are differences between the two timelines that doesn't automatically mean they are completely different timelines, especally when we have on-screen evidence detailing how this could be possible AND at least 2 official confirmations outright saying they are the same.

At this point I've given you on-screen evidence, quotes, statements, specific episodes, and have explained to you the ins and outs of shifting time and how it can affect timelines. At this point you're just ignoring all evidence that deconfirmes your headcanon. You're clinging to this idea that because someone like Paradox never explicitly stated the Ben 10,000 was the same as the one from the Original Series, then they must be 2 completely different people despite all evidence suggesting or even proving the contrary.

You ask for evidence, and when you get it, you ignore it. Then you ironically accuse the person you're talking to of ignoring your points and denying the reality of the situation when you have been doing exactly that this entire time.

Look at it this way. I have on-screen evidence, quotes, official statements, archived official statements, specific episodes, and have thoroughly explained multiple times how shifting time (a canon phenomenon) makes this all possible. If none of this swayed you, the problem isn't me not telling you about it, it's you not wanting to accept it.