Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9490823-20141017021534/@comment-9490823-20141018062928

ScottaHemi wrote: I don't think gravatack is powerful enough to create a black hole. you do need the gravity of 4 suns to create one let alone maintain one, i just don't think he's strong enough to pull that off.

Much of that massive energy is only required to initially generate the collapse of a red star, into an imploding supernova resulting in a high enough masss density to create  a gravitational pull stronger than light, and thus anything.

Black holes are the future of quantum mechanics however. Stephen Hawking's life work consisted of the analysis of black holes, including te existencwe of Hawking Radtion, the dispellation of mass from a black hole. There have been theorized primordial black holes that were generated in the later stages of the Big Bang, when the extremely high pressure and temperature resulted in the creation of "synthetic" black holes. Ie, black hjoles not generated by an imploding supernova.

Under these conditions, simple fluctuations in the density of matter may have resulted in black hole creation in the post big bang. This could be the reason for the gravitational structure of galaxies. But more importantly, it results in the theorized construction of micro black holes, when those conditions are replicated in a lab to generate, literally, black holes. The Schwarzschild Radius Formula gives us that the minimum required mass neccesary for the creation of a black hole is only Planck Mass, which is only 22 micrograms, not that much at all.

All that is needed for a black hole is for mass to be concentrated sufficiently that the escape velocity of that point's gravity exceeds the speed of light, resulting in an area that nothing can escape. No sense of massive mass is required for it. You don't need four sun's worth of mass for a black hole. That is simply what is required for nature to generate the neccexsary energy and means to create such a thing. But Gravattack would be under no such restrictions, nor would a synthetcic black hole be.

Of course, the density of this mass would have to be so great that it would be contained in a microscopic point in space, but it is still theoretically possible. This leads to the theiries of Micro Black Holes, the next nuclear power. In reality, the force required to generate a micro black hole isn;t that much at all. It is only the equivalent of a single TeV, or electronvolt. It is equal to 1.6*10^-16 joules. This energy can be generated from as single particle collider equal or large in size to an LHC (Large HAdron Collider).

The point being, the act of modifying gravity of objects without modifying its mass at all would result in the generation of countless micro black holes. And the term "micro" is relative. A "micro" black holeis would still be approximately the size of a large car or truck, that happens to suck in any matter that comes its way.