Thread:Blaziken rjcf/@comment-25584693-20170815221245

With all due respect,(I am 18 years old, and starting university this year so this actually does not concern me but) I think underage policy is kind of stupid (no offence) I mean, there is no rule saying that children  under the age of 6 cannot enter a wiki (even two year olds use tabs and phones sometimes here) While it's true that children mostly learn how to read and write at the age of 6/7 (1st grade), it does not apply to everyone (In the education system of Ottoman state for example, children would start to school at the age of 4 years and 4 months.) So a four or five years-old can be taught how to read and write, and maybe even make an account. Not to mention that we base their words for their age, but since they might be lying, we make the block last for 7 years. A 10 year old would be 17 to be able to edit again. (Also not to mention somebody had asked me if I were underage just because I did't use to have a good grammar (English is not my native language)) I think it should be that if they state that they are younger than 13, they must be blocked untill they are 13. If it's considered that the person lies about their age and younger than they state, they must be blocked for 5-7 years or anything like that, I think. 