Thread:Oneofthosedf/@comment-34326521-20150710111734/@comment-34326521-20150710215745

Note: "Long version" is shorthand for "addressing all the things I didn't address before", since the "short version" was already pretty damned long.

"But you can't ignore the fact that if I never come here, this wiki would still be pathetic."

Yeah, no. If it weren't you, it'd have been someone else. You have an inflated sense of your importance because you happened to be the second (yes, second - second to me) to go through article after article and fix errors. Again, the only difference is you still have time to do it constantly, whereas I do not. I did not take 16 hours to find an image; it took me 16 hours to arrange for time to find an image because, again, I have responsibilities offline, and not just college-related. So, rather than take hours I don't have to fix articles, I use my time to monitor for vandals, trolls, rule-breaking, and so on.

Specific instances of you overstepping your boundaries
Like I said, this wasn't about any one event. I can address all the ones you've mentioned if you'd like, but it doesn't mean anything, because it's not about any one of them, but the collective attitude you've had on the wiki.

Categories
Like I told you in the chat, unless you're planning on editing until either you or the series ends, the proper way to do things is the efficient way; the way through which changes can be enacted more quickly.

New accounts
There's a user who spoke to me and told me that, should he return, he'd do so under a very specific name. That would be proof-positive of the user's old moniker, since the name is something impossible to guess. All I have in regards to the Monitor071 incident is your word and his. And no, words don't prove anything; not even in real-life. Even if they did prove something in real life, as you said, this is the Internet. Finally, I said the only thing he couldn't do, assuming he was who he said he was, was vote in suggestions. I also added the following statement (paraphrased): "Given that he only seems interested in editing the forum, I don't see a problem with that". The requirements were created so only users invested in the wiki as something more than a social site could suggest changes to the wiki as a whole. If he's only interested in editing the forum, he's only interested in the social aspect of it all. Do try to stop yourself from engaging in quote-mining in the future. It doesn't bode well for you.

Editing
I do not, in fact, have to accept help I don't like. I especially don't have to accept help who doesn't know what they're supposed to do and what they're not supposed to do. Again, you have an inflated sense of your importance.

Stone miniature
There was someone - the writer of the actual episode, and not the guy who helped draw it - who said it wasn't. I also see you've forgotten that I renamed Verdona's article (before it was "Verdona Tennyson") and removed every instance of her being mentioned as Max's wife, because it wasn't confirmed. The same "obvious!" claims came about, until Derrick said otherwise; until Derrick said I was right. Suddenly, they all went silent. Not a single user who claimed they were definitely, without a doubt, married, had the common decency to do something as simple as say "I was wrong. My apologies". So, before you go around waving that incident, heralding it as some kind of "You made a mistake and should be hanged for it!" banner, you do well to remember every single other incident when I have been right. You also do well to remember I did not believe the stone miniature was not Darkstar, but there was cause for doubt, and that doubt didn't come down to claims made by Derrick and the writer of the episode, but also the events of the episode itself.

It's easy to point fingers when someone else is wrong. Not so easy to admit when you are wrong. I never brought up all the times I've been right and was met with resistance, because there was no need, but here's a short list:

So, go ahead and point to an event where I wasn't even wrong (again, you didn't hear any claims from me that Darkstar wasn't the stone figure). Just don't forget the ones where I've been right.
 * Gwen's middle name (it's not "Catherine", according to Dwayne himself)
 * Celestialsapiens' omnipotence (most users are under the mistaken belief that an omnipotent being must be the only one; this is a monotheistic religious notion that does not fit with the definition of "omnipotence")
 * Verdona and Max never got married (the "obvious!" crowd was just pushing societal norms where they don't belong - to aliens, for crying out loud)
 * Prisoner 775 isn't the source of ChamAlien's DNA
 * Ben 23 is not 13 years old

Rook's Brother
Useless to you, maybe, but your opinion is not the deciding factor. It made more sense to use a designation than a placeholder title - a title we know is given to all Revonnahganders before their naming ceremony.

Rollbacking
I'm unsure. Try it on an article that has a few images (doesn't matter which, but let me know beforehand, and only do it on that article) and I'll see.

MoS
My not remembering that type of article was there is something called "human error". When you stop making little mistakes due to your inherently flawed brain, feel free to chastise me about mine.