Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5486221-20190212142357/@comment-27464497-20190215213603

What? I Literally everything you have said was debunked back in 2014 after DJW's statement and Ultimate Ben 10,000 became a thing. What point have I not addressed? I just said in Ultimate Alien Ben was confirmed to be Ben Prime after time shifted. Professor Paradox even said as much to younger Ben when they met in the episode Ben 10,000 Returns (hey look more evidence). There's also the screenshot I posted earlier which you ignored. You're telling me I haven't posted evidence for anything I argued? Are you blind? Or are you just ignoring me?

In case you don't know, we're discussing Ben 10,000's timelines. Primus' existance is irrelevant to this conversation. Yes, at the time Dwayne was right because the Ben 10,000 he was talking about was the one from Ultimate Alien. The Omniverse and Original Series Ben 10,000 is a different Ben entirely thanks to Omniverse. But yes, that statement Dwayne made was canon at the time. But not now.

I gave proof already. Watch Ben 10,000 Returns and read that photo I posted earlier, it explains the shifting time phenomenon is a canon thing, and it can alter events without replacing entire timelines. Why do you ask for evidence only to ignore it, then get mad when people have to repeat themselves when you ask the same questions? It only wastes everyone's time.

'''"You can't shift time to make an altered future then say it's the same future because then it's not the same future." '''

It's the same future just altered. Did you not understand my tree analogy? If I show up to your house and replace all the doors with new glass doors. Is it now a completely different house, or is it the same house with some changes?

"The future isn't set in stone, of course."

That is true, we can at least agree on that.

"But because there are different events in the OS future, the UA future, and the OV future, they cannot and are not the same future."

Wait. You think I'm saying ALL Ben 10,000s are the same? No. That's not true and I never said that. The UA future is different from the OS/OV futures. In total we have seen two different versions Ben 10,000, not three. The one seen in the OS and OV are the same person and the one in UA is the other.

The statement I posted explicitly states that time shifting can alter events without creating or moving entire timelines.

You missed the point of the tree example entirely. It was to show you that something can be changed and still be the "same" thing. Hopefully the house analogy I made earlier in this comment gets my point across.