Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6527064-20151205151611/@comment-6883075-20160119065310

Um, I don't see where Seagle says. What he says is that he knew that they didn't have a rep when it was first made and didn't even have too much involvement in the original in the first place. He goes on to say that during the next installments they were making Generator Rex now that they had a better rep but still had financial interests (aka still got money from it) and creative involvement. I think it's easy to say that they owned the sequels and were involved when they're getting paid and still get to oversee development. He said that he knew that they would be less involved as it progressed, but I don't see where he says that they handed it off to others entirely ending off the connection between MoA and Ben 10.

I think your problem seems to be your bad at paraphrasing, unless I'm just understanding you wrong. If you'd read it how it's printed, it seems to say something entirely different to me.