Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-4848837-20140901041132/@comment-34326521-20140902090336

Cokedragon wrote: Relying on admin votes would somewhat ignore everybody else. Not to mention, what if there's then a tie among the voting admins?

Well, making the tiebreaker a random process would effectively ignore 50% of users. This way, the admins get to vote as well, taking into account slightly more than 50%.

There can't be a tie among admins, due to the number of them (or at least the number we intend to implement).

Cokedragon wrote: But that's how it's always been, and how it is in any vote. If even one person is the reason for a side winning, then so be it. There isn't a gray area around the tie.

I think there is, but that's something we can discuss after this idea is implemented, with a better tiebreaker system.