Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-7763430-20140409191255/@comment-7763430-20140415175736

The problem wth that logic is that people are more likely to voice their opinion on your Soap B... I mean... on your "Highlighted Informational Post". If it can be reasoned that my reasoning is reasonable, than it should be made so. The same for anyone who makes a point at any point or place in time. Why are you so hesitant to change things if it makes perfect sense? Your change makes it harder for people to find something that we can reason people would search for, but just barely. 11 is too high of a minimum number is all I am suggesting. I can perceive individuals searching Google or the Wiki for "Ben 10 Parody Characters" which had 3 pages. At the same time, that page (along with a few others that were deleted) follow all of your other guidelines, and so are not going to interfere with the archival efficiency of the Wiki. A better example was the Andromeda Five category, which had 10 pages. I added that category specifically because people will search for it and use it, but because it has 10 pages it gets deleted? Inapproppriate AND unacceptable.

Make an argument, or make a change.

My points:


 * Some relevant categories may be smaller than 11 pages.


 * The number of pages in a category does not interfere with the efficiency of the Wiki.