Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-34326521-20140915210718/@comment-34326521-20140915220251

Oneofthosedf wrote: Your criteria is absurd. I don't think you understand how many surprisingly long and popular pages would go to a massively big list of characters (which has low quality on every wiki). They don't hurt anyone by existing and all they need is some editing which I would do but even I don't have that much time.

They don't need any editing. They are too pointless to be a separate article. They have next to no information on them.

Oneofthosedf wrote: There is a template, a portal page and categories that link you to the minor characters, so at least they are all in one bunch.

Those are just links. They provide no information (what little there is to be provided anyway).

Oneofthosedf wrote: I have my own list about which characters should be deleted, trust me and I definitely will mark them if this don't get accepted.

Your list is irrelevant without clear criteria justifying why they should be deleted.

Oneofthosedf wrote: What do you think how long would that page be?

Very long. Hence the redirects.

Oneofthosedf wrote: And what about the galleries? Some really minor characters could have a lot of images.

Delete them. If the character was not onscreen for more than 5 seconds, every image will be pretty much the same.

Oneofthosedf wrote: I don't talk about bots, I don't like/trust those.

They work flawlessly if properly programmed. There are test wikis for this sort of thing, and many bots come with coding of their own.

Oneofthosedf wrote: I think human work, while is not perfect and has always had its faults is the best.

I think bots are better for repetitive tasks.

Oneofthosedf wrote: We don't have much of that here. I lost all my faith after a highlighted thread where I asked other to help me with something that they voted for got no reply or had any effects whatsoever.

As I've explained to you, we get the most editors just as episodes start airing in the USA and for a short period after they finish airing.