User blog comment:Madlooney6/Users and Warnings/@comment-24770490-20141205214951

The problem is that the admins who usually give warnings are not always here and can't see everything happening not to mention they might not be able to stay that long to read all the reports. While rulebreakers are always here, breaking rules. I have given dozens of warnings, along with Trigger009 who is not an admin either to users and they rarely had any complaints. The ones complained about that the person who warns them isn't an admin never stayed for more than three days and they only caused harm to the wiki.

Never mind, I think this just complicates things as we now will have to pay attention to the legibility of warnings given by users to users. As this was accepted before I became a council member I would say my opinion here in one sentence: You can see that this wasn't suggested by someone who usually warns/guides users. I do not mean to offend anyone but this will only kick back at the long run. It's basically the same thing when people only here to discuss stuff make suggestions about editing related stuff.

On the bright side, this might make the other admins to start giving more warnings, so users wouldn't think they are all inactive.