Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-4848837-20140901041132/@comment-4848837-20140902191901

Blaziken rjcf wrote: Cokedragon wrote: Relying on admin votes would somewhat ignore everybody else. Not to mention, what if there's then a tie among the voting admins? Well, making the tiebreaker a random process would effectively ignore 50% of users. This way, the admins get to vote as well, taking into account slightly more than 50%.

There can't be a tie among admins, due to the number of them (or at least the number we intend to implement).

There very well can be if an admin doesn't vote (and for whatever reason, can't vote -- such as in the case of brief inactivity, but that's probably unlikely.

So are you suggesting we don't allow the admins to vote at all except in the case of tiebreakers (because that would probably be a much better idea)?