Talk:Mad Ben

Sigh... What a waste of promising character.

Seriously? All that you could get is the trivial "evil-postapocalyptic-power-mad-warlord"? Nothing more? Let me guess - he was supposed to be that just because he is "evfil Ben"?

I really hate that black/white approach, that denied the characters of any motivation, or at least explanation just because they are "evil". The earlier series - "Alien Force" and "Ultimate Aliens" didn't have anything like that (I personally considered the Highbreeds arc as the greates in all series, in therms of dramatic and motivations). And now we have a situation of "ultimately Good Ben's" vs "ultimately Bad Ben's".

Seriously, you already have one "just evil Ben" - Bad Ben. For Pete's Sake, why you need ANOTHER "just evil", that different only in therms of clothes? Why not something more original? We already have one "generally good (not ultimate good) Ben" - Ben 23. Why not make some "generally bad (not ultimate bad) Ben"? The Mad Ben is a perfect candidate: he lived in postapocalyptic world, so he pretty logically could be ruthless, cruel - but not nessesary "all evil."

This is the cry of my soul about obvious possibilites...

Fonzeppelin (talk) 19:29, November 4, 2014 (UTC)