Thread:Oneofthosedf/@comment-34326521-20150710111734/@comment-34326521-20150710232847

"How do you know if anyone else would have done 47000+ contributions?"

How do you know nobody would have? Can you see into alternate timelines? Are you the only human being on the entire planet who can do what you did?

"Yeah, you were the first, I can only be second. Like I care, it's not a competition."

My point wasn't to emphasize that you were the second, but rather that you weren't the first. In other words, to emphasize that someone else would have shown up, just as you did.

"Like I don't know that. I think you just like to talk like this."

You literally said I had taken 16 hours to find the image.

"I found the image in 20 seconds (while we were arguing about it) but the fact chose to argue about it with me rather than looking into it shows where the wiki is in your priority list."

No, it shows your lack of knowledge. Go through hundreds of images, or finish a discussion; which one seems faster? To me, the latter seemed like it would end faster. Again, look up "human error".

"So do I man. Yeah, sure doesn't look like it. But I have a job, a family, friends and yes, I had school. I had to do tons of make up, I had exams too, a lot. Sure, Physics is probably the hardest and college is even harder but that particular incident wasn't about college. You just chose to argue."

Assuming you have responsibilities, they are definitely not as time-consuming as mine, since you keep finding the time to edit for the better part of a day. I can't edit during class, for obvious reasons, and the only time I'm not in class at college is when I'm having lunch.

Your attitude
I've said this before: you severely overestimate your status here. You could have written every single article on your own, and you still wouldn't have the status you believe you have. You seem to believe you and you alone can do what you do. You're wrong, plain and simple.

Categories
I see you've ignored the feature I mentioned. I won't repeat myself.

Editing
Your point being...?

Stone miniature
You clearly weren't paying attention to other issues. Every single time the majority of the wiki's userbase believes an unsupported, fan-made theory, there's massive backlash when any admin prevents said theory from being put in the articles. Every single time, they misunderstand the issue. Every single time, if they're right, they'll act like they're always right; if they're wrong, they will remain quiet until the next issue arises. This issue was just like all those others. The only difference is the wiki was more active at that time.

The problem isn't mentioning my mistakes (again, this wasn't one of them); the problem is mentioning things I've explained so often that every time it's brought up, I honestly wish Wikia had a built-in ignore feature. The problem is mentioning my mistakes like I've never been right. The problem is mentioning my mistakes like you've never made any. The problem is mentioning my mistakes and being intentionally dishonest about what I've said, time and time again. The problem is mentioning my mistakes and lying about what I've said, about what the issue is, and about what the evidence is, time and time again.

Rook's Brother
Your argument hinges on what you consider useless, which is why I addressed that bit, followed by why I did what I did - you seem to have ignored that, for some bizarre reason.

Anyway, I'm done with this discussion. I've issued you a warning about overstepping your boundaries. This discussion goes beyond that scope, so it's useless to me.