Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-34326521-20140915210718/@comment-4384097-20140920233647

Blaziken rjcf wrote: Puma7372 wrote: What Feedback100 said, if your selectionism is going to cause you to suppress legitimate opinions. Replace "legitimate" with "uninformed" and "suppress" with "ignore because they're uninformed, thereby potentially spoiling the voting procedure", and you might get it. As for "selectionism", I have no idea what that means. That term doesn't exist, as far as I know. Regardless I've stated that my reason is the same as Feedback's. Is his reason sufficient to count as a vote? Then so is mine.