Thread:Bc9661/@comment-34326521-20141025005305/@comment-34326521-20141025072740

Blocking anyone who is younger than thirteen is not my idea of intuitive either. As I've explained time and time again, it's the law. It's also why anonymous editing is disabled throughout the wiki - Wikia itself contacted us, letting us know that they'd be doing that and why.

Just so I (or rather, you) understand something: you take online courses which, by your own admission, are vague, yet what I - a student with actual teachers who answer virtually any and all questions that are within the scope of their knowledge (particle physics, atomic physics, astrophysics, thermodynamics, theoretical physics, chemistry, math), among other things - say can't be trusted? The point I'm trying to make by asking this (rhetorical) question is for you to understand that when you use phrases like "still a student", you're actually shooting yourself in the foot. Yes, I'm a student. So are you. The difference is I have access to people with degrees who can explain a variety of physics-related subjects to the best possible level (within reason), not to mention that you're in middle school, whereas I am not. I will say right away you do seem smart (smarter than almost every middle-schooler I can recall), but you should know your limits.