Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6527064-20151205151611/@comment-26812877-20160120001213

No, you don't signify that I'm right or wrong but that is what I believe is going through your head. That I believe that you don't want to be proved wrong. Why? Because, for the most part, nobody likes to be proved wrong. That is just how people are. I will admit that there are times that I was wrong, even though I don't like to be wrong. Although, I hope to god that I'm wrong about my predictions of the Ben 10 reboot because we really do need a great Ben 10 show again. I just don't see that likelihood happening though. If it turns out that I was wrong about you, then my apologies.

I've read that article thoroughly and, at least to me, it confirms what the Ben 10 Wiki and Tv Tropes explained about MOA and Ben 10. That Man of Action were not involved with the Ben 10 sequels. They faced some problems with Cartoon Network and as a result, Cartoon Network transferred the Ben 10 series over to new management. Man of Action still remains credited with the series, however, because they created Ben 10 in the first place so of course CN is still going to credit MOA in the sequel shows. And no, Man of Action does not own Ben 10. They created it but CN owns it. Otherwise, the series would have likely not been transferred to new management and we would have likely got Ben 10 Hero Generation, the sequel to the Original Series that Man of Action wanted to make, instead. There was even an AMA on Reddit done by Joe Kelly a while back where he stated that he rather wanted to keep the more fantasy and mystical elements of the Original Series around and thus would rather keep Gwen's magic elements, meaning that he would have likely rather wanted Gwen to be a human sorceress and not be half Anodite. Kelly also states that CN owns Ben 10 and even though MOA was involved with the series, hey haven't controlled everything with the franchise within the last 10 years.

https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3uhm13/i_am_joe_kelly_man_of_action_writer_of_i_kill/

I understand other people's complaints of me. A lot, if not most, of them revolved around my opinions about the reboot and the Ben 10 sequels, which I greatly understand because my opinions conflict with other people's opinions. A lot of people do like the sequels but I don't so of course at least some people are going to have a problem with me no matter how much I argue my points as to why I don't like the sequels and why I have such little faith in the upcoming reboot. There are other complaints in regards to mistakes that I made and I apologize for that. After all, not everyone is perfect. In fact, I believe that nobody is perfect and everyone has their flaws.

Well, other than the badly executed rant that you gave out and other people here are having problems with you on, yes, you didn't say anything rude. However, where in my messages do I state sarcasm and put in insulting remarks to your messages? Sarcasm is using irony to mock or convey contempt. Where in any of my previous responses to you have I stated anything ironic and using it to mock you? I wasn't using sarcasm or at the very least wasn't trying to intentionally. Sarcasm is a lot less vague on the internet than you think.

Sorry if this was long and off topic guys.