Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-3096633-20170908152553/@comment-31420441-20170908190027

Blaziken rjcf wrote: We have been thinking about people to promote, as you can see here.

Ok that came after my comment. But for the past 1 week since the discussion was approved nothing was done "as seen by us" as we didn't that the bureaucrats were discussing this. For 1 whole week. So you can chill about that as it wasn't our fault.

As for the "so-called" edit war, well, I was editing on basis of what was approved and didn't know "then" that you *with your bureaucrat rights* had decided to ignore the result and only and only go by your compromise. If that was your intention at the first place, might as well have closed the suggestion after stating the compromise. That would have made your intentions clear and no edits would have been caused from my side.

Thirdly, about what you explained about the suggestions system, I got it. Chill. I have even admitted multiple times that I do know you have the rights and all. I get it. Okay. I used to think (back during the CotG's page's edits) that the suggestions system was definitive. Didn't know the reality. So forgive me.

As for your comment about a dozen out of a thousand being rejected, (less like thousand and more like 100-200 I guess) I get it. You're right there.