Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5486221-20190212142357/@comment-27464497-20190218130637

It doesn't contradict Derrick's word as Matt never said Primus existed. That's what "contradicted" means. If one guy says "this thing exists" then to contradict it another guy must say "this thing doesn't exist". Otherwise it isn't a contradiction. Matt just said it may exist or it may not, he never took a stance on it. Aren't you the ones claiming to be logical?

When I said that I meant nothing Derrick said about OV/OS Ben 10,000 has been proven wrong by Matt which was and still is true. It is canon the future (be it certain aspects or an entire future) can change at any time for any reason. Us being told the future changed yet again isn't enough justification to seperate what we're told to be the same future with some retcons made to it. Back to my car analogy, if I repaint my car, I haven't bought a new car, I just altered my old car. This is textbook science fiction. The Ben 10 franchise isn't exclusive to changes like this.

While it is true that not every little detail is absolute fact from him, we have confirmation the writers were active in making the OS and OV futures that same. So what we're arguing over isn't even a rouge statement from Derrick with no writer imput, it's literally confirmation the writers were already doing it. Making the timelines the same was something the entire writing team was doing, how have you forgotten that so quickly?

You're ignoring my question for a third time. The entire resaon this suggestion was made was because the two timelines have continuity differences so you speculate they may be different timelines. I responded by saying OS, UAF,  OV episodes 1-4, and OV episodes 5-80 have plenty of continuity differences as well. By the logic of your own argument you must believe the OS, UAF, and OV are actually 4 different timelines. You have ignored this massive hole in you logic for days now because you only want to use it to the point where you cn get something out of it. So my question to you is; If differences in continuity mean the OV/OS futures are entirely different timelines does that mean OS, UAF, and OV are in fact 4 different timelines due to the countless differences they have between each other? And if not, how can they all still be one timeline despite all those continuity differences, yet the future seen in OS/OV must be seperated because of some continuity differences? Where's the logical consistency here? I thought you were the universe's standard when it came to logic given often you touted your logic (albeit inconsistently) so much.