Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-34326521-20150812172654/@comment-24770490-20150813211912

I ignored the Superbike issue because I thought it was over. I don't need to react to your reaction. I pointed out that it happened.

"You are under the impression that administrators have to do all the editing" No, just no. I complained enough about the users who don't edit, but it's not their job and I can live with that. I do the majority of the editing because I like doing it, so i don't get why you are under the impression that I think admins should do all the editing.

"why aren't you complaining that editors don't edit?" That was my entire last year.

My apologies about the manipulative part.

"There are wikis where admins will block you for saying this, and I'm not even kidding." I'm not on any of those wikis, also there were two wikis when I said this, I was made an admin on both. Not saying that this is the natural outcome, but I don't see how this info is relevant.

"So much for empathy, I guess." You made a scene and the fact that you used words like that made it even funnier and it sounded like coming from a robot. Ironically, they do not feel pain. Also, just mark the link and the color is gone.

"The drama only started when you lost your impartiality." I never lost it, I have never been impartial about this issue.

"They are more experienced than you." Wow, wow. Let's not make that jump. They registered sooner. Time doesn't equal experience. Especially, that this is about the later period of the wiki, when we were all around.

"You sure act like we're claiming infallibility, by ignoring those two points - particularly the second one." My very fist question was; any plans of improving the administration?, not; any plans of taking the administration to the omniscient level? it's about time.

So we have two regular users and two newbies who think that the administration is good and we have two custodian powerusers who think it's not all that. Good thing, it's not a vote.