Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-13886763-20160426181210/@comment-24546423-20160501102625

Superalexiy wrote: Stryzzar wrote: Well even if that's the case, de-aging isn't instantaneous. You could de-age Diagon a few centuries and he'd still have more than enough power to kill Maltruant.

Actually amortal means something that can't be killed because they were never technically alive. While immortal means alive but can't die, it doesn't neccessarily mean they have to have been "born". He can stop time and de-age Diagon then. On the superpower wiki it stated that

"May be erased from history via the effects of  time-manipulating powers, killing the immortals in question  before they become immortal." I have this question a seond thought and have come to conclusion that Maltruant wins as argued above. Time powers are one of the greatest powers. On the other hand, it depends whether the two beings will directly choose their extreme measures.If not, then, the one who will go first for it wins.