Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28149042-20160609140505/@comment-28149042-20160612014737

Oneofthosedf wrote: It actually wasn't Omniverse's fault. UA had the lowest ratings, and OV does well internationally, and like it or not that's what matters.

The original crew didn't want to continue working on the show, so why try to continue it? Not like this was the reason. CN tries to appeal to children between 4-7, because that way they can earn the most.

Ben 10 needs to be re-introduced to younger audiences. AF was fine because it was a direct sequel to the OS, however, UA was trying to appeal to an older audience, but that's just a flawed thinking process. There weren't nearly enough people watching the show. OV tried to go back and appeal to younger audiences, which they managed to do but since the previous series didn't gather younger audiences, it had lower ratings than expected (domestically). I like this explanation you have given me, thanks, :) before AF the Man of Action were planning a sequel called Ben 10: Hero Generation. Wouldn't that have been better?