Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-34326521-20150812172654/@comment-34326521-20150813215021

Oneofthosedf wrote: I ignored the Superbike issue because I thought it was over. I don't need to react to your reaction. I pointed out that it happened.

The way you pointed it out implied that I agreed with what had been done, since you only quoted that part of my reply to you. Quote-mining is a very bad practice.

Oneofthosedf wrote: No, just no. I complained enough about the users who don't edit, but it's not their job and I can live with that. I do the majority of the editing because I like doing it, so i don't get why you are under the impression that I think admins should do all the editing.

For starters, because one of the complaints you (personally) have is that we don't always help you with editing.

Oneofthosedf wrote: That was my entire last year.

I don't recall that, but it was just a minor point, so I'll just end this topic here.

Oneofthosedf wrote: My apologies about the manipulative part.

I'm not sure if you're apologizing for your assumption or the incomprehensible English, the latter of which is what I was referring to.

Oneofthosedf wrote: I'm not on any of those wikis, also there were two wikis when I said this, I was made an admin on both. Not saying that this is the natural outcome, but I don't see how this info is relevant.

I expanded on that point beyond that.

Oneofthosedf wrote: You made a scene and the fact that you used words like that made it even funnier and it sounded like coming from a robot. Ironically, they do not feel pain. Also, just mark the link and the color is gone.

So I get complaints because I don't express emotion (trying to be professional), and I get indifference when I do express emotion. Gotcha.

Oneofthosedf wrote: I never lost it, I have never been impartial about this issue.

Get someone who is then.

Oneofthosedf wrote: Wow, wow. Let's not make that jump. They registered sooner. Time doesn't equal experience. Especially, that this is about the later period of the wiki, when we were all around.

Time does equal experience when you visit the wiki regularly, as those two do. I find it strange these problems only arose in the later period of the wiki, after you registered, but not before, when you claim to have visited and edited as an IP.

Oneofthosedf wrote: My very fist question was; any plans of improving the administration?, not; any plans of taking the administration to the omniscient level? it's about time.

I do have a plan. The first part involves getting a list of issues, which you have provided. The second part involves getting the current group of admins to improve on those issues. Should the second part fail, demotions (and promotions, if it is deemed necessary) will be made.

Oneofthosedf wrote: Saying that they didn't notice anything wrong is not evidence, the things I said, are.

Saying that two thirds of the users who posted here didn't have any complaints is evidence that the ones who have complaints aren't that many. This part wasn't about the problems you posted here, some (many?) of which I agree with. This was about the number of users who have issues with the administration.