Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5486221-20190212142357/@comment-5101200-20190215190621

Nice question deflecting and projecting.

Everything we've done in favor of our argument is argue against points with actual evidence, while you bounce around questions not actually answering them just repeating yourself from previous posts even though what you're saying is just... wrong. The two futures aren't actually the same and we have statements and lore proving that, the only thing proving the contrary is Derrick forcing his objectively incorrect headcanon onto it even though his argument proves himself wrong, as time shifting would make it a different future. Differences =  different future. Thinking that differences are irrelevant may as well be an example of you ignoring things to benefit your argument. You're saying that they don't matter but... They do. They literally do. If they didn't, this conversation wouldn't be happening. You can't say things don't matter just because they don't benefit your argument, which is exactly what you're doing by saying the cake and differences are irrelevant when they are completely relevant. If time shifts to alter the future then it is not the same future, because now it's altered. Similar? Yes. Same? Absolutely not.

Now, how about you give us some actual points as to where the show established time shifting? Or are you just going to dodge that question and project your own argumentative issues on our arguments again?