Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-3096633-20170908152553/@comment-34326521-20170908184831

Shocker03 wrote:

Blaziken rjcf wrote: Aaronbill, I'm honestly getting quite upset at the way you and Shocker lie about me. In the most recent thread for my demotion, Shocker claimed that I don't let suggestions pass if I'm against them, which is demonstrably untrue. Just go back and look at any suggestion I voted against; many of them passed. Now you're lying about my compromise, which I have already pointed out in the suggestion regarding the CotG. More precisely, you're making up stuff that I didn't say and proclaiming it to be factual.

If you're not willing to be honest and truthful, I see no reason to speak with you, since you'll just twist whatever I say to suit your narrative. Now you are twisting my words. I never meant that every single one of the suggestions you don't like you ignore, but you do that with some at least. And how exactly was Aaronbill lying about your "compromise"? Did you act on your "compromise solution?" Were there provisional regular users to fill the CotG? Don't tell me it takes you a week to come up with 1 name to ask to get promoted.

It's not like you have to choose from a 100 users who are really active. It takes 1 week after asking people if they're still active to determine who needs to be demoted and who doesn't, as 1 week should be enough time for them to drop a message saying yes or no. Afterward (meaning, now), we can begin promoting people. I explained this in the suggestion thread. After that, we'll add as many regular users as are needed.