Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5584417-20140315150724/@comment-5584417-20140326065001

Blaziken rjcf wrote: @Xanton:

Ultimates's point is that, for some statements on the show, saying who said it is irrelevant, because the statement is true (like the core example). For others, where the speaker's opinion is relevant (like Azmuth and Paradox saying Ben was like them when they were younger), it shouldn't be removed.

@Xanton Exactly, we would remove, as you yourself said, only when it is unnessecary. Read the criteria. You are right about the Derrick thing, but well, if it is an opinion by a person it should not be removed. You probably didn't read the criteria before writing and assumed that every according to shall be removed. But that's not the case. And if Derrick changes something Dwayne did, it is up to him and the show is now in his hand. Would we clutter the trivia just to say that Dwanye said X but Derrick said Y but now X is not considered Y is so forget X? I would say we just write Y and remove the X cause its irrelevent.

@Blaziken If he really didn't read the criteria, I would suggest you don't count his vote.