Thread:Bchwood/@comment-7763430-20140414045638/@comment-34326521-20140415065028

Solember wrote: And yet you posted it as thought he said it, wrote it in blood and time traveled backwards in time to inscribe it on the 10 commandments. As far as spam goes, I didn't say "back me up". I said "Your opinion matters, since they were voicing their opinions in the wrong places. I stand by what I said. Blaziken is too opinionated and self justifying to be a valid administratior on a wiki. Context matters. A user said: "The wiki says the unknown stone figure is Darkstar." (or something like that). Kevin replied "Don't trust everything you read on the net.". In addition, Charlotte said that unless something happened in the show, it isn't canon.

You spammed, and, as far as I could tell, only posted that thread in the walls of people who agreed with you (coincidence?), not to mention that you hid the truth from at least one, by not posting the link to my highlighted thread and outright lying about why the relevant pages are locked. You told Chillmanfire, and I quote, "Following that thread, you can see that Blaziken is ignoring community outcry and Policy #6 to support his personal views. He lists no solid sources and ignores several reliable ones, brushing them off based on uncited claims.". I put the part where you were lying in bold. There's one source that agrees with you: Derrick. In addition, I did list a "solid source". His name is Kevin Rubio.

I am not ignoring community outcry. In fact, that's why I created the highlighted thread you called a "rant". I received 8 kudos for that thread, which is more than any other thread I've seen on the wiki. It is clear that a large chunk of the community at least understands why I locked the pages, even if they don't agree with Kevin. It is also not my opinion that the stone figure is Darkstar, just like it wasn't my opinion that Whampire and Lord Transyl weren't Vladats and just like it's not my opinion that Ben's actor isn't a Sludgepuppy. You're missing the point, which is: unless something is confirmed beyond reasonable doubt, we don't put it on articles. I've said this plenty of times, but even though sometimes the admins may agree with you (and often times we do), it's not about whether everyone agrees or not (search "Ad populum" on Wikipedia) or even if it's obvious to you (remember Fasttrack? Or is it XLR8? Or Clockwork? Or Eatle?). It's about what has been confirmed and what hasn't.

PS: Tell you what: since you posted a link to this thread on several message walls, I'll do the same. Same number of message walls you posted your message on, only different users. See if they can get you to understand why the relevant pages are locked.