Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-7503158-20170908103337/@comment-34326521-20170908113704

Where to start...

1. What kind of information is removed, exactly? Right, false/unconfirmed information, fan speculation, that sort of thing. It's as constructive as creating new articles.

2. Because it's not arguable nor up for debate. It's a fact, and facts are not a matter of consensus nor opinion.

3. As an admin (or more precisely, a bureaucrat), I hold the right to shut down any and all suggestions that I deem would be bad for the wiki. The CotG is NOT for a group of 5 users to determine wiki policy. The Suggestions system is a way for admins to know what the users want and then determine whether or not to implement it. More often than not, we do.

4. The fact that I don't edit doesn't mean I'm inactive. In case you missed the thread on my message wall, I'm the only one who's been cleaning up Discussions all this time.

5. See point 3. Your suggestion ignored what the CotG is intended for.

6. This person also posted profanity and ignored several warnings to stop with the spreading of false information. At least tell the whole story, Echoson. You'll note that someone who did not post profanity was only banned for 3 days.

7. It was a mistake, which I recognized. If you want perfect admins, get a robot.