Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5584417-20140315150724/@comment-1409915-20140324142111

I oppose.

I completely understand what Ultimates is trying to say but in my opinion (formatted as an argument) the name's and according to are necessary. As both a fan and someone who helps edit wiki's using them is made simple by small details such as this in just everyday regards to finding things. Yes I agree at time's it may seem unecessary but really to be able to have like a reference or such to what has been said by who make's it easier to understand the universe.

Example if you were to say that Revonnah's core spins counter clockwise then it would be taken as a fact that this is what happens. If you said "According to Rook" the core spins counter clockwise then it is a matter of Rook's opinion. According to Derrick is in another category altogether and shouldn't be edited out at all since that's actually according to him, a creator of the show.

Like if Dwayne said X about the Omnitrix but Derrick said Y you'd want to know that for the reason of knowing which opinon is valid and which is non canon.

Back to the matter at hand, to say "Acoording to [name]" tells us this is a character's opinion. Like how according to Albedo Peanut Butter Seawood Smoothies are Ben's favorite and taste like feet when According to Ben in The Big Story and other references in Omniverse (I believe it was Blukic and Driba go to Mr. Smoothy's) Ben says he's allergic to Peanuts.

This gives us information into who says what so we know what could be their opinons, lies, misunderstanding or fact.

I hope that makes an inkling of sense.

I am in opposition to removal.