Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-4384097-20141025201303/@comment-1409915-20141028164155

Oneofthosedf wrote: Xanton wrote:

Now to the topic at hand, why does that matter still. I get it, friends can ask other people to join and they can do whatever they want. That still shouldn't be something to cut people out of deliberation. That's scrutinizing for no reason other than suspicion. You have no evidence to back up that he has been contracted by someone else to vote not to mention he's actually given evidence he's been here before, and people losing account info is not unheard of.

Either way not letting him vote whether he's new or not, voting for a friend or his own opinion that's not right. If there's no rule that says he can or cannot vote than he should be able to contribute to any vote to his hearts content, new or not, support or opposing. He didn't give any evidence. I searched for users with that name, I didn't find any. I will make a suggestion soon but I first want to talk an admin about it.

You are basically saying that voting against/for a suggestion because of a friend rather than based on opinion is perfectly fine. If you can't find him alright then. You can't authenticate, makes sense you'd be suspicious but for goodness sake don't suggest a rule about new users not being able to vote. That's ridiculous.

All I'm saying on the subject of friend vote or whatever is that it doesn't matter because unless you know the person physically how do you know anyone on this wiki isn't influencing someone else all the time? How do you know I'm not buying votes (I'm not. Don't have money to waste like that.) How do you know Silentia Atum isn't telling Lightning Wolf to vote a certain way? How do you truly know is all I'm saying.

Short answer is you won't, so it's irrelevant if he just joined or not it's just the same as anyone else.