Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5486221-20190212142357/@comment-5486221-20190218123047

Matt saying "That remains to be seen. Nothing is definite until addressed in Omniverse." (or something to that effect) counts as contradicting Derrick's word. Just because he didn't outright say Primus was still around doesn't mean he didn't contradict Derrick. The latter part of that quote applies to the whole show. He didn't say "nothing about Primus is definite". He said "nothing", as in nothing the crew members say or have said in the past is definite until it is addressed in the series. In addition, the only reason I brought up Undertown was because you said "...Derrick's word was never overshadowed by Matt's word as the two never contradicted each other."

The entire basis of this suggestion is based on canon proof. No matter what Derrick or you have said, there is a greater amount of solid in-series evidence that proves that they are not the same, other than the fact that it simply does not make sense for shifting timelines to cause the exact same future.

Not everything that comes from Derrick has to or should be taken as canon fact. Again, his word has been contradicted in the past and it is being contradicted by Matt, canon proof and logic in this case.