Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-4908075-20190413100016/@comment-4908075-20190413184835

Alanomaly wrote: In-show is what should be taken as canon first and foremost since that is what makes it set in stone. The show contradicts the idea of OS and OV Ben 10K being the same, therefore they should not be on the same page or considered the same person/future. They are not the same. And you will happily gloss over the fact that I mentioned about Animo Crackers, the TPTB issue, fact that Ben's daughter was a simple case of retcon, and suggest that you think that the show contradicts OS Ben 10K, while the writers of the show obviously intended for the exact opposite. OV episode tries to incorporate elements introduced in AF-UA-OV into the OS future best it can without contradicting/changing OS future (Gwen's and Kevin's attire, Omnitrix City, Ken, Kevin oscillates from being mad to being good, etc. etc.) but just because along the way it introduced any bit of new ideas suddenly in contradicts everything in OS.

Why do you want to show that the writers were wrong in their own scripts? And even if they were, who are you to correct them?